East Asia and the EU: which contribution to the world trade system? / Patrick Messerlin

The Bali WTO Ministerial may have been a successful exercise in “declaring victory and leave”, but there are few hopes that the huge rest of the Doha Agenda will be subjected to negotiations in a predictable future. How to assess such a situation? On the one hand, it is very regrettable that negotiations on tariffs, quotas and subsidies will not be pursued in the WTO forum which is, by far, the best place to negotiate such issues. On the other hand, the WTO does not seem the best place to negotiate in a substantial manner about regulatory issues—be technical norms in goods, regulations shaping services markets (trade and investment) intellectual property rights, and to some extent public procurement.

Read paper in .pdf


Most comments do not require moderator approval but this will only last as long as everyone plays fair

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s